 |
eSCM ASSESSMENT
STANDARD v1.0
The scorecard
The eSCM assessment standard 1.0
The assessment standard consists of
two things:
 |
An eSCM scorecard
(questions with a maturity scale) |
|
 |
 |
Performance indicators:
this has two areas |
 |
 |
e-capability
indicators |
 |
Supply
chain performance indicators (SCOR metrics). |
|
|
Inputs to developing the scorecard
have come from multiple sources
What is the Scorecard?
The scorecard is a series of questions
on collaborative supply chain practices
which are to be measured against an e-maturity scale
 |
The flow of
questions follows the SCOR* model: |
 |
 |
The
scorecard has 5 key sections –
Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, Return
– based on Level 1 SCOR Processes |
 |
Each
section has subsections based on SCOR
Level 2 – e.g. Plan supply chain,
Plan source, Make to stock, Deliver
make-to-order etc |
 |
Each
of these subsections have SCOR Level
3 process elements – e.g. Aggregate
supply chain resources (P1.2), Schedule
product deliveries (S2.1), Route shipment
(D2.6) |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Each
of these process elements at SCOR Level
3 have one or more questions attached
which aim to measure the level of collaboration
and e-maturity of the organisation |
 |
Responses
to these questions can be compared to
the available choice of response to
identify the score for that question
which can range from 0 to 400. |
|
 |
 |
 |
* The
scorecard is based on the Supply-Chain Operations
Reference-model (SCOR) 5.0 and uses the supply
chain processes outlined in the model. We
would like to acknowledge and thank the Supply
Chain Council for allowing us to use the SCOR
model for developing the scorecard. |
|
The on-line scorecard flow
The Scorecard profile
|
 |
 |
The questions
may appear numerous. But if you go through
the selection of processes at Level 2 based
on what is relevant for your business, you
will have a much shorter list of questions |
 |
Reason: Under
Source, Make and Returns there are sub-sections
for make-to-stock, make-to-order and engineer-to-order
categories. These are further sub-divided
into external partners and internal partners. |
|
|